Essay #1 Leisure
Leisure means the accessibility of having spare time, the
author writes about an old man who has no objective in his life. “Old Leisure” is
what the author named him, Eliot refers to him as a human being who lives a
simple but relaxing life and lists all the wonderful activities Old Leisure has
done to keep himself in company. “He was
a contemplative, rather stout gentleman of excellent digestion,” Eliot
describes Leisure in a positive way, acting as if she has watched Leisure for a
long time. The last lines of the poem shows that Leisure’s life has become so
attached to Leisure that he won’t be responsible enough to go to church.
The way “old
Leisure” was described was how he lived a life, smelling the apricots and felt
amusement. Eliot describes leisure as if it’s he is her friend; she talks about
his leisure of being able to live a normal life with museums, sleeping, and
eating dinner. “He fingered the guineas in his pocket, and ate his dinners, and
slept the sleep of the irresponsible,” the life Old Leisure lived was
unbelievable to the author in a way she was offended when his sleep missed the
Sunday church. From the art museums to
Sunday sermon were all Leisure’s activities, Eliot scolds, “Fine old Leisure!”
because Leisure is irresponsible, he did not go to church on Sunday. Eliot is
trying to say, with all the time in the world, how Old Leisure could miss
Sunday church. The author describes Leisure as if he was blessed and lucky to
be living a quiet, ease life.
The author
George Eliot describes calls an old man, “Old Leisure” because of the plentiful
time and days he has with his life. He lives such a luxurious and inattentive
life therefore the author makes a comment when he has all the time in the
world, how can his miss church. Eliot makes a comment about how irresponsible
he is to forget church, but it’s because he’s lived a life without any
responsibility. Old Leisure lives day by day, the author says, “life was not a
task to him,” meaning that life was not difficult for old Leisure. Eliot
describes Old Leisure in an envious and aspiring way.
Essay #2: Modification
“Death was a friend, and sleep was
Death's brother.” In the book, Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck, the Joad
family suffers from the Great Depression, struggling to survive they work in a
brutal condition to tame fields of grapes. The family goes through a series of
events such as death, starvation, and ultimately losing everything they once
had in their possession changed their attitudes from the beginning to the
end. As the family’s journey continues
on, the author modifies the reality of Joad’s poverty and instead makes the
idea of “American Dream” as the theme.
The Joad family starts off as a
fairly normal, not rich, but an average family; as the Great Depression hits,
the family continues to move until they have found a stable job. As for in
reality, the Joad’s are suffering from poverty, they have no job, no money, or
the necessities to live. Steinbeck instead blurs the problems and focuses on
the Joads working hard to feed their loved ones and ultimately searching for
the “American Dream.” The struggling of working in the grape plantation
develop, Steinbeck continues to overlook the poor, money-less family. Joad’s
called their work, “the grapes of wrath,” because that’s what will help them
escape from the Great Depression, but it’s actually what leads to their so
called, “American Dream” which in fact was a bittersweet dream to the Joads.
Steinbeck wrote The Grapes of Wrath
with an intention of one theme which was endeavor the American Dream, although
the book itself was about undertaking poverty and living life with empty
pockets. The life events relating to the fact they family was poor and starving
because of the Great Depression was modified in order to overlook the power of
poverty and focus on the Joads’ lack of necessities they had to overcome to get
to the end. The reason for Steinbeck to write this way was to stand out the
hardship and to put poverty on aside, so it doesn’t become the center of
attention. The modification allowed the novel to be uprising rather than
concentrating on poverty.
Essay #1....
ReplyDeleteYou used a lot of evidence from the text which really made your essay strong! However, I don't really know if all of it was interpreted correctly? For instance, I don't quite know where he used "she" in his piece?... For this essay, I would give it a 5 because I don't quite know if the text was interpreted correctly but, you had a good argument regardless of that.
Essay #2
This essay is filled with textural evidence! Its insanely strong! Your views on the themes and how Steinbeck saw the opportunity to advocate social change were valid points and actually great to read!.. I would give this essay a 6 or a 7 because of all the evidence you had in your essay! Good Job MIKI!!!